Predicate: nonenhance
Roleset id: nonenhance.01 , not be darkened by contrast dye, not enhancing, growing greater, Source: , vncls: , framnet:
nonenhance.01: NONENHANCE-V NOTES: Based on Thyme data. No comparison. No VN or FN classes. Framed by Katie. (from nonenhance.01-v) NONENHANCING-J NOTES: Based on instances in Thyme and comparison to enhancing-j.01. (from nonenhancing.01-j)
Aliases:
Alias | FrameNet | VerbNet |
nonenhance (v.) | | |
nonenhancing (j.) | | |
Roles:
        I don't think all of these roles are possible with negative
        polarity item, but exist for symmetry. (from nonenhancing.01-j)
        Arg0-PAG: cause of enhancement, contrast, dye
        Arg1-PPT: entity enhanced
        Arg2-MNR: instrument to show no enhancement (ie PET or CT scan)
Example: Arg 2
        person: ns,  tense: ns,  aspect: ns,  voice: ns,  form: ns
        nonenhancing CT scan
        Rel: nonenhancing
        Arg2: CT scan
Example: arg 1, requiring concatenation
        person: ns,  tense: ns,  aspect: ns,  voice: ns,  form: ns
        nonenhancing left frontal mass
        Rel: nonenhancing
        Arg1: [left], [frontal], [mass]
Example: Arg 0 - you need the contrast to see enhancement/non-enhancement on CT
        person: ns,  tense: ns,  aspect: ns,  voice: ns,  form: ns
        nonenhanced contrast
        Rel: nonenhanced
        Arg0: contrast
Example: Arg1 only, probably very typical usage
        person: ns,  tense: ns,  aspect: ns,  voice: ns,  form: ns
        - In reviewing the scans , I see no clear - cut benefit of trying to obtain tissue diagnosis seeing as how the lesion isnonenhancing and is rather sparse.
        Arg1: the lesion
        Rel: nonenhancing