Predicate: claim

Roleset id: claim.01 , assert, Source: , vncls: , framnet:

claim.01: CLAIM-V NOTES: Frames file for 'claim' based on sentences in financial subcorpus. Verbnet class claim 37.7, other framed members include declare(?). Comparison with assert. (from claim.01-v predicate notes) CLAIM-N NOTES: Based on verb entry claim.01; corresponds to Verbnet class claim 37.7-1. (from claim.01-n)

Aliases:

AliasFrameNetVerbNet
claim (n.)
claim (v.)
make_claim (l.)

Roles:

        Arg0-PAG: claimer, asserter (vnrole: 37.7-1-agent)
        Arg1-PPT: thing claimed, asserted (vnrole: 37.7-1-topic)
        Arg2-GOL: hearer (vnrole: 37.7-1-recipient)

Example: arg1 as infinitive

        That represents a very thin ``excess'' return, certainly far less than what most fundamental stock pickers claim *trace* to seek as their performance objective.

        Arg0: most fundamental stock pickers
        Rel: claim
        Arg1: *trace* to seek as their performance objective

Example: arg1 as full sentence

        Some even claim the group has become a lagging, not leading, indicator.

        Arg0: Some
        Argm-dis: even
        Rel: claim
        Arg1: the group has become a lagging, not leading, indicator

Example: arg1 as NP

        A shareholders' accord would provide the first restitution to thousands of individuals and institutions claiming losses as a result of insider trading by Boesky& Co., once the largest arbitrage fund in the U.S..

        Arg0: individuals and institutions
        Rel: claiming
        Arg1: losses as a result of insider trading by Boesky& Co., once the largest arbitrage fund in the U.S.

Example: passive extraction

        DD Acquisition has launched a suit in a Delaware court seeking the withdrawal of Dunkin's poison pill rights and employee stock ownership plans, which it claims *trace* were put in place to deter bidders.

        Argm-rcl: which -> Dunkin's poison pill rights and employee stock ownership plans
        Arg0: it
        Rel: claims
        Arg1-str: *trace* were put in place to deter bidders

Example: with hearer

        person: third,  tense: past,  aspect: ns,  voice: active,  form: participle

        As he left, the man apologized and claimed to her that his gun wasn't a real firearm, just an unloaded BB gun.

        Argm-tmp: As he left
        Arg0: the man
        Rel: claimed
        Arg2: to her
        Arg1: that his gun wasn't a real firearm, just an uloaded BB gun.

Example: Within LVC

        The U.S. attorney 's office , in documents it filed in response , said Mrs. Marcos was making the `` fanciful -- and factually unsupported -- claim that she was kidnapped into this country '' in order to obtain classified material in the case .

        Arg0: Mrs. Marcos
        Argm-lvb: making
        Argm-adj: the "fanciful -- and factually unsupported --
        Rel: claim
        Arg1: that she was kidnapped into this country ''
        Argm-prp: in order to obtain classified material in the case .

Example: All arguments

        The suspect did not leave the country contrary to her claim to Pilapil that she was in Australia prior to the incident.

        Arg0: her
        Rel: claim
        Arg2: to Pilapil
        Arg1: that she was in Australia prior to the incident.

Roleset id: claim.02 , seize, Source: , vncls: , framnet:

claim.02: CLAIM-V NOTES: Frames file for 'claim' based on sentences in financial subcorpus. Verbnet class claim 37.7, other framed members include declare(?). Comparison with assert. (from claim.02-v predicate notes) CLAIM-N NOTES: Based on verb entry claim.02; No corresponding VN Class. (from claim.02-n)

Aliases:

AliasFrameNetVerbNet
claim (v.)
claim (n.)

Roles:

        Arg0-PAG: claim staker
        Arg1-PPT: property
        Arg2-GOL: beneficiary

Example: all args

        person: ns,  tense: ns,  aspect: ns,  voice: ns,  form: ns

        Cortez claimed the new territory for Queen Anna

        Arg0: Cortez
        Rel: claimed
        Arg1: the new territory
        Arg2: for Queen Anna

Example: With CAU

        person: ns,  tense: ns,  aspect: ns,  voice: ns,  form: ns

        I certainly encourage people to claim in the event [0]-2 [the cover]-1 could not be CLAIMED on *-1 [*T*-2], or if they were not told about it and it was not mentioned in their documents -LRB- sometimes it s sold as an after agreement cover , ie when you activate the card , they sell it to you then as a separate thing , but some people were just told they had to have it , which was wrong -RRB- , but I do nt like this idea of people basically trying to steal money from the lender by making false claims .

        Argm-mod: could
        Argm-neg: not
        Rel: claimed
        Argm-cau: on *-1
        Argm-adv: [*T*-2]

Example: A more straight-forward example of arg1 and CAU in a similar usage

        person: ns,  tense: ns,  aspect: ns,  voice: ns,  form: ns

        My question is , does the above give us sufficient reason [0]-1 *PRO* to make a complain to Nationwide and potentially claim for the following [*T*-1]:

        Arg0: *PRO*, *link -> [us]
        Argm-adv: potentially
        Rel: claim
        Arg1: for the following
        Argm-cau: [*T*-1]

Example: Idiomatic

        person: ns,  tense: ns,  aspect: ns,  voice: ns,  form: ns

        Her claim to fame is that she can recite the entire works of Shakespeare.

        Arg0: Her
        Rel: claim
        Arg1: to fame

Example: With benefactive

        person: ns,  tense: ns,  aspect: ns,  voice: ns,  form: ns

        This form provides a claim of tax credit for nonresident military spouses.

        Rel: claim
        Arg1: of tax credits
        Arg2: for nonresident military spouses