Arg0:viewer
Arg1:thing viewed
| see an NP (-) | |
|---|---|
| |
| Arg0: | John |
| REL: | saw |
| Arg1: | the President |
| NP with secondary attribute (-) | |
|---|---|
| |
| Arg0: | John |
| REL: | saw |
| Arg1: | [the President][collapse] |
| see an S (-) | |
|---|---|
| |
| Arg0: | John |
| REL: | saw |
| Arg1: | (that) the President collapsed |
| NP and attribute as PP (-) | |
|---|---|
| |
| Arg0: | John |
| REL: | saw |
| Arg1: | [the President][as a fool] |
The fundamental difference between the embedded S and the NP-with-attribute is that in the embedded S the embedded verb is marked for tense (it isn't in the NP-with-attribute), and the embedded subject will not show accusative case: "John saw him collapse" vs "John saw the he collapsed".
Arg0:accompanier
Arg1:entity in motion
Arg2:destination
| a polite young man (-) | |
|---|---|
| |
| Arg0: | John |
| REL: | saw |
| Arg1: | the President |
| Arg2-DIR: | to his car |
Arg2 could also be "out" or some other non-PP.
Arg0:you
| you see (-) | |
|---|---|
| |
| Arg0: | you |
| REL: | see |
I don't know if this even occurs.
Arg0:ensurer
Arg1:fixed: 'to it'
Arg2:proposition, event
| see to it (-) | |
|---|---|
| |
| Arg0: | They |
| Argm-MOD: | should |
| REL: | see |
| Arg1-to: | it |
| Arg2: | that their kids don't play truant |