Arg0:Sayer
Arg1:Utterance
Arg2:Hearer
Arg3:Attributive
Transitive (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg0: | A Lorillard spokeswoman |
REL: | said |
Arg1: | "This is an old story" |
Fronted (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg0: | the company |
REL: | said |
Arg1: | *trace* -> Kent cigarettes were sold* |
Inverted (-) | |
---|---|
| |
REL: | said |
Arg1: | *trace* -> What matters is what advertisers will pay |
Arg0: | Newsweek's chairman |
Split (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg1: | ["What you have to understand"] ["is that Philly literally stinks"] |
REL: | said |
Arg0: | John |
with listener (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg0: | John |
REL: | said |
Arg2-to: | to Mary |
Arg1: | "you're an idiot" |
Weird, attributive usage: (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg1: | "Well that's odd" |
REL: | said |
Arg0: | John |
Arg3-of: | of the disappearance of his nose |
As discourse-level event (-) | |
---|---|
| |
REL: | say |
Arg1: | John |
split utterance (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg1: | [John][to be an idiot] |
REL: | said |
Note: In most cases Treebank suggests an S-BAR as the object of "say"; PReditor selects the S inside the S-BAR as the Arg1. I feel it really should be the S-BAR, because of the cases like "John said THAT he loved Mary" where the S-BAR is selected as Arg1, but in actual usage the complementizer is usually dropped. But since it would slow down throughput *enormously* to retag all of these cases, we'll accept what PReditor selects in both cases (with and without complementizer).