Arg0:Sayer
Arg1:Utterance
Arg2:Hearer
Arg3:Attributive
| Transitive (-) | |
|---|---|
|  | |
| Arg0: | A Lorillard spokeswoman | 
| REL: | said | 
| Arg1: | "This is an old story" | 
| Fronted (-) | |
|---|---|
|  | |
| Arg0: | the company | 
| REL: | said | 
| Arg1: | *trace* -> Kent cigarettes were sold* | 
| Inverted (-) | |
|---|---|
|  | |
| REL: | said | 
| Arg1: | *trace* -> What matters is what advertisers will pay | 
| Arg0: | Newsweek's chairman | 
| Split (-) | |
|---|---|
|  | |
| Arg1: | ["What you have to understand"] ["is that Philly literally stinks"] | 
| REL: | said | 
| Arg0: | John | 
| with listener (-) | |
|---|---|
|  | |
| Arg0: | John | 
| REL: | said | 
| Arg2-to: | to Mary | 
| Arg1: | "you're an idiot" | 
| Weird, attributive usage: (-) | |
|---|---|
|  | |
| Arg1: | "Well that's odd" | 
| REL: | said | 
| Arg0: | John | 
| Arg3-of: | of the disappearance of his nose | 
| As discourse-level event (-) | |
|---|---|
|  | |
| REL: | say | 
| Arg1: | John | 
| split utterance (-) | |
|---|---|
|  | |
| Arg1: | [John][to be an idiot] | 
| REL: | said | 
Note: In most cases Treebank suggests an S-BAR as the object of "say"; PReditor selects the S inside the S-BAR as the Arg1. I feel it really should be the S-BAR, because of the cases like "John said THAT he loved Mary" where the S-BAR is selected as Arg1, but in actual usage the complementizer is usually dropped. But since it would slow down throughput *enormously* to retag all of these cases, we'll accept what PReditor selects in both cases (with and without complementizer).