Arg0:decider
Arg1:decision
Arg2:benefactive
Arg3:attribute of arg1
| rule a sentence (-) | |
|---|---|
| |
| Argm-TMP: | In August |
| Arg0: | the commission |
| REL: | ruled |
| Arg1: | between $190 million and $195 million of the plant's construction cost was unreasonable and should be refunded, plus interest. |
| rule on (-) | |
|---|---|
| |
| Arg0: | *trace*=The commission |
| REL: | rule |
| Arg1-on: | the Braidwood 2 case |
| Argm-TMP: | by year end |
| with benefactive (-) | |
|---|---|
| |
| Argm-LOC: | In a case involving Avondale Industries Inc. and its insurer, Travelers Cos. |
| Arg0: | the Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York |
| REL: | ruled |
| Arg2-in: | favor of the company |
| Arg1-on: | two issues that lawyers say are central to dozens of pollution cases around the country. |
In this last one the preposition is really (imho) "in favor of", but multi-word prepositions aren't recognized by anyone but me.
| with attributive (-) | |
|---|---|
| |
| Arg1: | *trace-2*=*trace-1*=that=a merger |
| REL: | ruled |
| Arg3: | anticompetitive |
| Argm-LOC: | in a private suit |
Arg0:ruler, leader
Arg1:unwashed masses, minions
| rule over (-) | |
|---|---|
| |
| Arg0: | mankind |
| Argm-NEG: | not |
| REL: | rule |
| Arg1-over: | this natural environment |
| just plain rule (-) | |
|---|---|
| |
| Argm-TMP: | still |
| REL: | ruled |
| Arg1: | [*] -> East bloc countries |
| Arg0-by: | Stalinist holdouts |
| with explicit mention of rulership (-) | |
|---|---|
| |
| Arg0: | [*-1] -> the Indian leader |
| REL: | rule |
| Argm-PRD: | as the dominant partner in a coalition with other parties. |
Arg0:eliminator
Arg1:thing eliminated
Arg2:eliminated from (?)
| not anymore (-) | |
|---|---|
| |
| Arg0: | Paribas Chairman Michel Francois-Poncet |
| Argm-MOD: | would |
| Argm-NEG: | n't |
| REL: | rule out |
| Arg1: | *trace* eventually selling all of Navigation Mixte's insurance operations to Allianz. |