Arg0:decider
Arg1:decision
Arg2:benefactive
Arg3:attribute of arg1
| rule a sentence (-) | |
|---|---|
|  | |
| Argm-TMP: | In August | 
| Arg0: | the commission | 
| REL: | ruled | 
| Arg1: | between $190 million and $195 million of the plant's construction cost was unreasonable and should be refunded, plus interest. | 
| rule on (-) | |
|---|---|
|  | |
| Arg0: | *trace*=The commission | 
| REL: | rule | 
| Arg1-on: | the Braidwood 2 case | 
| Argm-TMP: | by year end | 
| with benefactive (-) | |
|---|---|
|  | |
| Argm-LOC: | In a case involving Avondale Industries Inc. and its insurer, Travelers Cos. | 
| Arg0: | the Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York | 
| REL: | ruled | 
| Arg2-in: | favor of the company | 
| Arg1-on: | two issues that lawyers say are central to dozens of pollution cases around the country. | 
In this last one the preposition is really (imho) "in favor of", but multi-word prepositions aren't recognized by anyone but me.
| with attributive (-) | |
|---|---|
|  | |
| Arg1: | *trace-2*=*trace-1*=that=a merger | 
| REL: | ruled | 
| Arg3: | anticompetitive | 
| Argm-LOC: | in a private suit | 
Arg0:ruler, leader
Arg1:unwashed masses, minions
| rule over (-) | |
|---|---|
|  | |
| Arg0: | mankind | 
| Argm-NEG: | not | 
| REL: | rule | 
| Arg1-over: | this natural environment | 
| just plain rule (-) | |
|---|---|
|  | |
| Argm-TMP: | still | 
| REL: | ruled | 
| Arg1: | [*] -> East bloc countries | 
| Arg0-by: | Stalinist holdouts | 
| with explicit mention of rulership (-) | |
|---|---|
|  | |
| Arg0: | [*-1] -> the Indian leader | 
| REL: | rule | 
| Argm-PRD: | as the dominant partner in a coalition with other parties. | 
Arg0:eliminator
Arg1:thing eliminated
Arg2:eliminated from (?)
| not anymore (-) | |
|---|---|
|  | |
| Arg0: | Paribas Chairman Michel Francois-Poncet | 
| Argm-MOD: | would | 
| Argm-NEG: | n't | 
| REL: | rule out | 
| Arg1: | *trace* eventually selling all of Navigation Mixte's insurance operations to Allianz. |