Roleset redevelop.01 Verbnet Class: 1 "create":

Roles:

Arg0:creator


Arg1:thing created


Arg2:source


Arg3:benefactive


Arg4:attribute of arg1

Examples:

transitive (-)
John redeveloped a strong argument
Arg0:	John
REL:	redeveloped
Arg1:	a strong argument




transitive-1 (-)
UCLA redeveloped a new promoter gene
Arg0:	UCLA
REL:	redeveloped
Arg1:	a new promoter gene




but (-)
John redeveloped a new promoter gene at UCLA
Arg0:	John
REL:	redeveloped
Arg1:	a new promoter gene
ArgM-LOC:	at UCLA

person: ns tense: ns aspect: ns voice: active form: infinitive


creation as DO (-)
Mitsubishi is also pushing ahead with a controversial plan *trace* to redevelop Marunouchi into a business center of high-tech buildings, a project budgeted for 30 years and six trillion yen.
Arg0:	*trace* -> Mitsubishi
REL:	redevelop
Arg2:	Marunouchi
Arg1-into:	a business center of high-tech buildings




with source (-)
John redeveloped a strong argument from the footnotes of the paper.
Arg0:	John
REL:	redeveloped
Arg1:	a strong argument
Arg2-from:	from the footnotes of the paper




with end-result (-)
John redeveloped the footnotes into a strong argument.
Arg0:	John
REL:	redeveloped
Arg2:	the footnotes
Arg1-into:	into a strong argument




with benefactive (-)
Bill Gates redeveloped DOS for Microsoft
Arg0:	Bill Gates
REL:	redeveloped
Arg1:	DOS
Arg3-for:	for Microsoft

these are also -PRPs, but the tag -PRD can be changed to -PRD-PRP during postprocessing


with secondary predication (-)
Albert M. Kligman redeveloped Retin-A to combat acne
Arg0:	Alber M. Kligman
REL:	redeveloped
Arg1:	Retin-A
Arg4:	to combat acne




with secondary predication (-)
Albert M. Kligman redeveloped Retin-A for combating acne
Arg0:	Alber M. Kligman
REL:	redeveloped
Arg1:	Retin-A
Arg4:	for combating acne

The above structure should be used in all cases, even when it feels like the Arg1 and the purpose clause (secondary predicate) are very closely linked and feel like they should be a single argument. Treebank is inconsistent in it treatment of these; sometimes it's split into two nodes, sometimes there's a single node holding both. If we are consistent in dividing these arguments, it's relatively easy for someone else to merge them. The reverse is not true.


Manner (-)
John redeveloped the beach through a trust
Arg0:	John
REL:	redeveloped
Arg1:	the beach
ArgM-MNR:	through a trust

Plus the usual assortment of TMPs, LOCs (easily confusable with MNRs, nota bene), ADVs, etc.