Arg0:motivation
Arg1:impelled agent
Arg2:impelled action
all args (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg0: | *trace* -> *trace* -> little |
REL: | motivate |
Arg1: | gold traders |
Arg2: | to buy the metal |
unstated action (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg0: | They |
REL: | motivate |
Arg1: | sales people |
ArgM-MNR: | with commissions |
passive, unstated action (-) | |
---|---|
| |
ArgM-MOD: | can |
REL: | motivated |
Arg1: | *trace* -> The workers |
The unstated action seems to default to "whatever arg1 does".
Arg0:justifier
Arg1:decision or attitude being shown to be right
Arg2:explicit instrument
Arg3:secondary predication on arg1
Arg4:benefactive, justified to
only transitive (-) | |
---|---|
| |
REL: | motivated |
Arg1: | *trace* -> the group's actions |
ArgM-ADV: | solely |
Arg0-by: | health concerns |
all args (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg0: | John |
REL: | motivated |
Arg1: | his dissertation |
Arg4-to: | his committee |
Arg3-as: | worthy of consideration |
Arg2-by: | calling it "super way-cool" |
Rolesets might be difficult to distinguish in the transitive. Ontology of the arg1 might be the key: only agentive entities can appear in arg1 of motivate.01, while objects and actions can appear as arg1 of motivate.02. I'm not certain if agentive entities could appear as arg1 of motivate.02, but if they did, their agentive status would be external to the act of motivation.