Arg0:causer, frustrater
Arg1:entity frustrated
Arg2:target of frustration
would this actually work? (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg0: | *trace* -> *trace* -> he |
REL: | frustrate |
Arg1: | his quarry |
passive (-) | |
---|---|
| |
REL: | frustrated |
Arg1: | *trace* -> Corporate leaders |
Arg0-by: | double-digit increases in health-care costs |
exceptional use of arg2 (-) | |
---|---|
| |
REL: | frustrated |
Arg1: | *trace* -> the Treasury |
Arg2-at: | the Fed's reluctance to cut interest rates to pull down the dollar's value |
Usually for class 31.1 arg2 is the instrument, and only present when the subject is also present. This is exceptional. It would seem weird to introduce arg0 by 'at', and there's a real semantic difference between the causer of frustration, and the target. of the frustration.