Arg0:cause of fear
Arg1:frightened entity
Arg2:instrument, if separate from arg0
Arg3:intensifier
transitive (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg0: | *trace* -> *trace* -> raiders |
REL: | frighten |
Arg1: | a company 's managers |
with instrument (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg0: | Mary |
REL: | frightened |
Arg1: | John |
Arg2-with: | her blood-red fingernails |
instrumental subject (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg0: | Mary's blood-red nails |
REL: | frightened |
Arg1: | John |
with intensifier (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg0: | *trace* -> much more |
REL: | frighten |
Arg3: | the hell |
Arg1: | out of retail investors |
another intensifier example (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg0: | these wide swings |
REL: | frightening |
Arg1: | them |
Arg3: | to death |
Unlike some of the other verbs which haven't tried to distinguish agent and subject, you really must try with psych verbs. It's bad enough that we're ignoring the distinction between intentional agent and non-intentional (but still non-instrumental) agent. For example, in the second example, did Mary really *mean* to frighten John, or was it an accident? The former would make her an intentional agent, the latter an unintentional agent. This can only be determined by a LOT of context, which we don't have, and even then it can be hard to tell.
Arg0:cause of fear
Arg1:frightened entity
Arg2:instrument, if separate from arg0
automatically generated (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg0: | *trace* -> Their opposition |
REL: | [ frighten] [ off] |
Arg1: | some Japanese banks |
This is pretty clearly an intentional subject, but frighten off could also take an unintentional subject.
Arg0:causer of fear
Arg1:frightened entity
Arg2:instrument, if separate from arg0
automatically generated (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg0: | the sharp swings in stock prices |
ArgM-TMP: | lately |
REL: | [ frightening] [ away] |
Arg1: | retail and foreign investors |