Arg0:assigner of date
Arg1:item being labelled
Arg2:date
passive, point date (-) | |
---|---|
| |
REL: | dated |
Arg1: | *trace* -> Both issues |
Arg2: | Oct. 31 |
same thing, missing trace (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg1: | The bills |
REL: | dated |
Arg2: | Oct. 31 |
date back to: separated (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg1: | Federal credit programs |
REL: | date |
ArgM-DIR: | back |
Arg2-to: | the New Deal |
date back to: joined (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg1: | Lincoln's examination reports by former regulators |
REL: | dating |
Arg2: | back to 1986 |
passive: terminus post quem (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg1: | cosmic rays |
REL: | dating |
Arg2-from: | the birth of the universe |
with agent (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg0: | John |
REL: | dated |
Arg1: | the contents of his fridge |
Arg2-to: | the early 1960's |
Treebank gives an unbelievable range of syntaces for sentences containing 'date'. This should be a high priority for fixing, once we get the go-ahead to fix Tb.
Arg0:dater
Arg1:dated
as opposed to? (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg0: | *trace* -> Lily |
REL: | dating |
Arg1: | boys |