Arg0:assigner of date
Arg1:item being labelled
Arg2:date
| passive, point date (-) | |
|---|---|
| |
| REL: | dated |
| Arg1: | *trace* -> Both issues |
| Arg2: | Oct. 31 |
| same thing, missing trace (-) | |
|---|---|
| |
| Arg1: | The bills |
| REL: | dated |
| Arg2: | Oct. 31 |
| date back to: separated (-) | |
|---|---|
| |
| Arg1: | Federal credit programs |
| REL: | date |
| ArgM-DIR: | back |
| Arg2-to: | the New Deal |
| date back to: joined (-) | |
|---|---|
| |
| Arg1: | Lincoln's examination reports by former regulators |
| REL: | dating |
| Arg2: | back to 1986 |
| passive: terminus post quem (-) | |
|---|---|
| |
| Arg1: | cosmic rays |
| REL: | dating |
| Arg2-from: | the birth of the universe |
| with agent (-) | |
|---|---|
| |
| Arg0: | John |
| REL: | dated |
| Arg1: | the contents of his fridge |
| Arg2-to: | the early 1960's |
Treebank gives an unbelievable range of syntaces for sentences containing 'date'. This should be a high priority for fixing, once we get the go-ahead to fix Tb.
Arg0:dater
Arg1:dated
| as opposed to? (-) | |
|---|---|
| |
| Arg0: | *trace* -> Lily |
| REL: | dating |
| Arg1: | boys |