Arg0:thinker
Arg1:object, thing under consideration
Arg2:attribute on arg1
active (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg0: | Economists |
REL: | consider |
Arg1: | that |
Arg2: | a sign that inflationary pressures are abating |
passivized (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg1: | Shorter maturities |
REL: | considered |
Arg2: | a sign of rising rates |
Argm-CAU: | because portfolio managers can capture higher rates sooner. |
passivized as parenthetical (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg1: | Paribas' officials |
Argm-TMP: | once |
REL: | considered |
Arg2: | France's toughest bankers |
PP (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg1: | *trace* -> David Dinkins |
REL: | considered |
Arg2-for: | a city job |
as-phrase (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg0: | good students |
REL: | consider |
Arg1: | teaching |
Arg2-as: | a career |
Arg0:thinker
Arg1:action
active (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg0: | Commonwealth Edison |
REL: | considering |
Arg1: | *trace* appealing Judge Curry's order |
It could be that these two could be conflated, but I doubt it.