Arg0:blamer
Arg1:entity blamed
Arg2:blamed for what?
active, arg1 as DO (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg0: | The company |
REL: | blamed |
Arg1: | a number of factors |
Arg2-for: | the earnings decline |
ArgM: | including softer sales of joint-implants |
passivized arg1 (-) | |
---|---|
| |
REL: | blamed |
Arg1: | *trace* -> a form |
Arg2-for: | recent volatility in the market |
active, arg2 as DO (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg0: | USAir |
ArgM-DIS: | for example |
REL: | blamed |
Arg2: | some of its loss |
Arg1-on: | disruptions caused by Hurricane Hugo last month |
passivized arg2 (-) | |
---|---|
| |
ArgM-TMP: | lately |
REL: | blamed |
Arg2: | *trace* -> Much of the instability in stock prices |
Arg1-on: | arbitrage trading, designed to profit from differences in prices between stocks and index futures |
deciding case? (-) | |
---|---|
| |
Arg0: | Fina |
REL: | blamed |
Arg1: | lower chemical prices , reduced gasoline margins and refinery maintenance shutdowns |
The last example seems to leave aside the 'reason' argument, leading me to believe that should be arg2. But it's pretty much a tossup either way.