Arg0:blamer
Arg1:entity blamed
Arg2:blamed for what?
| active, arg1 as DO (-) | |
|---|---|
| |
| Arg0: | The company |
| REL: | blamed |
| Arg1: | a number of factors |
| Arg2-for: | the earnings decline |
| ArgM: | including softer sales of joint-implants |
| passivized arg1 (-) | |
|---|---|
| |
| REL: | blamed |
| Arg1: | *trace* -> a form |
| Arg2-for: | recent volatility in the market |
| active, arg2 as DO (-) | |
|---|---|
| |
| Arg0: | USAir |
| ArgM-DIS: | for example |
| REL: | blamed |
| Arg2: | some of its loss |
| Arg1-on: | disruptions caused by Hurricane Hugo last month |
| passivized arg2 (-) | |
|---|---|
| |
| ArgM-TMP: | lately |
| REL: | blamed |
| Arg2: | *trace* -> Much of the instability in stock prices |
| Arg1-on: | arbitrage trading, designed to profit from differences in prices between stocks and index futures |
| deciding case? (-) | |
|---|---|
| |
| Arg0: | Fina |
| REL: | blamed |
| Arg1: | lower chemical prices , reduced gasoline margins and refinery maintenance shutdowns |
The last example seems to leave aside the 'reason' argument, leading me to believe that should be arg2. But it's pretty much a tossup either way.