Predicate: redevelop

Roleset id: redevelop.01 , create, vncls: 26.1 26.2, framnet:

redevelop.01: these are also -PRPs, but the tag -PRD can be changed to -PRD-PRP during postprocessing The above structure should be used in all cases, even when it feels like the Arg1 and the purpose clause (secondary predicate) are very closely linked and feel like they should be a single argument. Treebank is inconsistent in it treatment of these; sometimes it's split into two nodes, sometimes there's a single node holding both. If we are consistent in dividing these arguments, it's relatively easy for someone else to merge them. The reverse is not true. Plus the usual assortment of TMPs, LOCs (easily confusable with MNRs, nota bene), ADVs, etc.

Roles:

        Arg0: creator (vnrole: 26.1-Agent, 26.2-Agent)
        Arg1: thing created (vnrole: 26.1-Product, 26.2-Product)
        Arg2: source (vnrole: 26.1-Material, 26.2-Material)
        Arg3: benefactive (vnrole: 26.1-Beneficiary)
        Arg4: attribute of arg1

Example: transitive

        John redeveloped a strong argument

        Arg0: John
        Rel: redeveloped
        Arg1: a strong argument

Example: transitive-1

        UCLA redeveloped a new promoter gene

        Arg0: UCLA
        Rel: redeveloped
        Arg1: a new promoter gene

Example: but

        John redeveloped a new promoter gene at UCLA

        Arg0: John
        Rel: redeveloped
        Arg1: a new promoter gene
        ArgM-LOC: at UCLA

Example: creation as DO

        person: ns,  tense: ns,  aspect: ns,  voice: active,  form: infinitive

        Mitsubishi-1 is also pushing ahead with a controversial plan *trace*-1
        to redevelop Marunouchi into a business center of high-tech
        buildings, a project budgeted for 30 years and six trillion yen.

        Arg0: *trace*
        Rel: redevelop
        Arg2: Marunouchi
        Arg1: into a business center of high-tech buildings

Example: with source

        John redeveloped a strong argument from the footnotes of the paper.

        Arg0: John
        Rel: redeveloped
        Arg1: a strong argument
        Arg2: from the footnotes of the paper

Example: with end-result

        John redeveloped the footnotes into a strong argument.

        Arg0: John
        Rel: redeveloped
        Arg2: the footnotes
        Arg1: into a strong argument

Example: with benefactive

        Bill Gates redeveloped DOS for Microsoft

        Arg0: Bill Gates
        Rel: redeveloped
        Arg1: DOS
        Arg3: for Microsoft

Example: with secondary predication

        Albert M. Kligman redeveloped Retin-A to combat acne

        Arg0: Alber M. Kligman
        Rel: redeveloped
        Arg1: Retin-A
        Arg4: to combat acne

Example: with secondary predication

        Albert M. Kligman redeveloped Retin-A for combating acne

        Arg0: Alber M. Kligman
        Rel: redeveloped
        Arg1: Retin-A
        Arg4: for combating acne

Example: Manner

        John redeveloped the beach through a trust

        Arg0: John
        Rel: redeveloped
        Arg1: the beach
        ArgM-MNR: through a trust