Predicate: permit
permit: Frames file for 'permit' based on sentences in financial subcorpus. Comparison with 'allow'.
Roleset id: permit.01 , permit, let, allow, vncls: 65 64 60, framnet: Grant_permission Permitting
permit.01: VN updated by Julia. Member of Vncls admit-65, allow-64, order-60.
Roles:
Arg0: allower (vnrole: 65-agent, 64-agent, 60-agent)
Arg1: action allowed (vnrole: 65-theme, 65-location, 64-theme, 60-patient, 60-proposition)
Arg2: extracted allowed-agent (vnrole: 65-agent, 64-theme, 60-patient)
Example: action is an NP
Proceeds of the loan agreement, together with funds from Vitro,
will permit the purchase of all shares outstanding of Anchor and
the payment of all related costs and expenses.
Arg0: Proceeds of the loan agreement
Argm-com: together with funds from Vitro
Argm-mod: will
Rel: permit
Arg1: the purchase of all shares outstanding of Anchor and the payment of all related costs and expenses
Example: action is an S, includes embedded agent
A warrant permits a holder to acquire one share of common stock
for $17.50 a share .
Arg0: A warrant
Rel: permits
Arg1: a holder to acquire one share of common stock for $17.50 a share
Example: passive
[U.S. investors]-1 will be permitted *trace*-1 to buy the shares from EC
investors 90 days later.
Argm-mod: will
Rel: permitted
Arg1: *trace*-1 to buy the shares from EC investors 90 days later
Example: secondary agent in situ
This last example and the action-as-S example show how Treebank was
inconsistent in the parsing of embedded agents. But whaddya gonna do?
Warner itself was in negotiations with MGM over certain movie and
other rights, and it was ``in Warner-1's interest *trace*-1 to accommodate
MGM/UA, Guber and Peters by *trace*-1 permitting them to become MGM
executives, ''Mr. Daly said in his affidavit.
Arg0: *trace*-1
Rel: permitting
Arg2: them
Arg1: to become MGM executives