Predicate: develop

Roleset id: develop.01 , come about, vncls: 48.1.1 48.3, framnet: Progress , Coming_to_be

develop.01: Updated by Julia (after much discussion) to address the weird 'location as subject' issue and inconsistancy in the annotation of theme. See Examples and VN. Member of Vncls appear-48.1.1, occurrence-48.3.

Roles:

        Arg1: location (vnrole: 48.1.1-location, 48.3-location)
        Arg2: theme (vnrole: 48.1.1-theme, 48.3-theme)

Example: Intransitive / Inchoative-- new annotation of theme

        A problem developed.

        Arg2: A problem
        Rel: developed

Example: transitive, location as subject!

        John's neck developed a big spot.

        Arg1: John's neck
        Rel: developed
        Arg2: a big spot

Example: transitive, theme as subject!

        A big spot developed on John's neck.

        Arg2: A big spot
        Rel: developed
        Arg1: on John's neck

Roleset id: develop.02 , create, vncls: 26.1 26.2, framnet: Cause_to_make_progress

develop.02: Member of VNcls build-26.1, grow-26.2.

Roles:

        The following structures should be used in all cases, even when it feels like the Arg1 and the purpose clause (secondary predicate) are very closely linked and feel like they should be a single argument. Treebank is inconsistent in it treatment of these; sometimes it's split into two nodes, sometimes there's a single node holding both. If we are consistent in dividing these arguments, it's relatively easy for someone else to merge them. The reverse is not true.
        Arg0: creator (vnrole: 26.1-agent, 26.2-agent)
        Arg1: thing created (vnrole: 26.1-product, 26.2-product)
        Arg2: source (vnrole: 26.1-material, 26.2-material)
        Arg3: benefactive (vnrole: 26.1-beneficiary)
        Arg4: attribute, secondary predication

Example: transitive

        John developed a strong argument

        Arg0: John
        Rel: developed
        Arg1: a strong argument

Example: transitive-1

        UCLA developed a new promoter gene

        Arg0: UCLA
        Rel: developed
        Arg1: a new promoter gene

Example: but

        John developed a new promoter gene at UCLA

        Arg0: John
        Rel: developed
        Arg1: a new promoter gene
        Argm-loc: at UCLA

Example: with source

        John developed a strong argument from the footnotes of the paper.

        Arg0: John
        Rel: developed
        Arg1: a strong argument
        Arg2: from the footnotes of the paper

Example: with end-result

        John developed the footnotes into a strong argument.

        Arg0: John
        Rel: developed
        Arg2: the footnotes
        Arg1: into a strong argument

Example: with benefactive

        Bill Gates developed DOS for Microsoft

        Arg0: Bill Gates
        Rel: developed
        Arg1: DOS
        Arg3: for Microsoft

Example: with secondary predication

        Albert M. Kligman developed Retin-A [to combat acne]

        Arg0: Alber M. Kligman
        Rel: developed
        Arg1: Retin-A
        Arg4: to combat acne

Example: with secondary predication

        Albert M. Kligman developed Retin-A for combating acne.

        Arg0: Alber M. Kligman
        Rel: developed
        Arg1: Retin-A
        Arg4: for combating acne

Example: Manner

        John developed the beach through a trust

        Arg0: John
        Rel: developed
        Arg1: the beach
        Argm-mnr: through a trust