Predicate: exist

Roleset id: exist.01 , be, exists ('non-existent' has its own frame, fyi), Source: , vncls: , framnet:

exist.01: EXIST-V NOTES: Based on big corpus; nominal 'existing' based on BOLT-7. Member of VNcls gorge-39.6, exist-47.1-1. (from exist.01-v) EXISTENT-J NOTES: Added by Julia based on BOLT-1, exist-v.01. exist-47.1-1 (from existent.01-j) EXISTING-N NOTES: Automatically created by Julia as an alias file for unification. (from existing.01-n)

Aliases:

AliasFrameNetVerbNet
existing (n.)
exist (v.)Existence
existent (j.)

Roles:

        Arg1-PAG: thing existing (vnrole: 39.6-agent, 47.1-1-theme)
        Arg2-PRD: secondary attribute of arg1

Example: existential angst

        ...a case of political corruption that-1 *trace*-1 simply doesn't exist.

        Arg1: *trace*-1 (= that)
        Argm-slc: that -> political corruption
        Argm-adv: simply
        Argm-neg: n't
        Rel: exist

Example: with secondary attribute

        person: third,  tense: present,  aspect: ns,  voice: active,  form: full

        John exists as a figment of my imagination.

        Arg1: John
        Rel: exists
        Arg2: as a figment of my imagination

Example: stupid WSJ style guide

        No mechanism *trace*-1 exists [for finding a middle ground]-1 .

        Arg1: No mechanism *trace*-1
        Rel: exists

Example: nominal rel: existing

        person: ns,  tense: ns,  aspect: ns,  voice: ns,  form: ns

        there must be in the mind at the same instant ideas of its existing in a considerable number of other points of time and place;

        Arg1: its
        Rel: existing
        Argm-loc: in a considerable number of other points of time and place

Example: the arg

        person: ns,  tense: ns,  aspect: ns,  voice: ns,  form: ns

        Which rights are ?fundamental? or even existent is entirely subjective.

        Arg1: which rights
        Argm-adv: even
        Rel: existent

Example: non-existent. Relemmatize!

        person: ns,  tense: ns,  aspect: ns,  voice: ns,  form: ns

        Even if the human factors involved in global warming are minimal or non-existent, is it such a terrible thing to ask people to pollute a little less?

Example: both args

        person: ns,  tense: ns,  aspect: ns,  voice: ns,  form: ns

        Socrates is existent as a man

        Arg1: Socrates
        Rel: existent
        Arg2: as a man