deal.01: DEAL-V NOTES: Probably two distinct senses, but syntactically similar enough to be merged. (from deal.01-v) DEAL-N NOTES: Added by Julia based on OntoNotes (n) deal.01 and PB deal.01. This nominalization is not a member of PB deal.01's Vncls, as that relates to a different sense that was grouped with this sense in PB, and does not have 'deal-n' as a nominalized counterpart. This frame differs from PB deal.01 in its inclusion of an additional arg, arg2, subject of transaction, which may appear frequently, and arg3, value of transaction, which appears occasionally. (from deal.01-n) DEALING-N NOTES: Added by Julia based on BOLT, deal-n.01, deal-v.01. Corresponds to VNcls cope-83. (from dealing.01-n)
This nominalization takes syntax that is somewhere between the         deal-v.01(handling) and deal-n.01(transacting) rolesets. I'm         breaking up dealing.01 and .02 based on syntactic behavior rather         than the semantic distinctions shown in deal-v and deal-n, which         looks like it's going to put 'drug dealing' into dealing.02. So,         fair warning. (from dealing.01-n)
Arg0-PAG: dealer (or all dealers)
Arg2-PRD: subject/type of transaction
Arg3-VSP: value of transaction
The idea was to let small investors, the backbone of the fund business, deal in the money market's high short-term interest rates.
Arg0: small investors, the backbone of the fund business,
Arg2: in the money market's high short-term interest rates
What is you stance on his dealing with China about Sikkim and Tibet ??!!!
Arg1-com: with China
Arg2: about Sikkim and Tibet
deal.02: DEAL-V NOTES: VN updated by Julia. Member of Vncls give-13.1. (from deal.02-v) DEAL-N NOTES: Updated by Julia. Member of Vncls give-13.1. (from deal.02-n) DEALING-N NOTES: Added by Julia based on BOLT, deal-n.02, deal-v.02. Corresponds to VNcls give-13.1 (from dealing.02-n)
But the computer-guided selling in response to those developments dealt a serious blow to the over-the-counter market, Mr. DaPuzzo said.
Arg0: the computer-guided selling in response to those developments
Arg1: a serious blow
Arg2: to the over-the-counter market
the first deal of the cards into three piles
Arg1: of the cards
Argm-prd: into three piles
While it starts off with Duke discussing how to narrow your decisions in a hand (complete with her dealing the cards to give examples), it eventually comes off as a little scattered.
Arg1: the cards
Argm-prp: to give examples
Example: dealing-n: All args- metaphorical distribution
I was wondering if you would care to expound on the bit about Napoleon and his dealing a blow to the catholic church ?!
Arg1: a blow
Arg2: to the catholic church